
Philippe Gratton
Jul 31, 2025
Compare top Allstacks alternatives to align your engineering and business goals.
You’re here because you care about what’s holding your engineering team back. Maybe you’ve tried Allstacks, or maybe you’ve just heard the name. Either way, something’s not clicking, and you're ready for a smarter way to track progress, manage delivery, and actually understand what’s going on inside your team.
In this article, you’ll get a closer look at 9 powerful Allstacks alternatives that are reshaping how software engineering teams manage delivery, track progress, and make smarter decisions.
Here, you won’t just see a list of tools. You’ll walk away knowing which ones actually help you move faster, align with your business goals, and give you real-time insights you can use.
Before you decide, here’s a quick comparison table to help you see how each platform stacks up.
Alright, before we go any further, let’s get clear on what Allstacks actually does.
Allstacks is a value stream intelligence platform that helps you monitor engineering performance across your tool stack. You get predictive analytics based on historical data, so you can track progress and spot risks early. It pulls data from tools such as GitHub and Jira Software, then turns it into visual reports to show how work is moving.
If you're leading a growing team, Allstacks helps you measure software delivery performance and align your engineering work with business goals.
That’s critical when you consider the benchmarks. According to the 2024 DORA report, elite teams deploy multiple times per day and recover from failures in under an hour, while low performers take one to six months per change and need up to a month to recover. Tools like Allstacks aim to close the gap between those elite performers and the rest of the pack.
Still, while it’s strong for tracking, some users find the sheer number of metrics overwhelming. And if financial visibility is a must-have, Allstacks might leave you wanting more.
So, let’s talk more about where this tool falls short and why you might want something better.
If you’ve used Allstacks or at least watched the demo above, you already know it’s built to analyze engineering performance. But it doesn’t always deliver what growing teams really need. Here are the main reasons you might want something better:
If you’re running into these issues, it’s probably time to look elsewhere. That brings us to the next thing you need to figure out, which is what you should actually look for in a smarter alternative.
If you're choosing a new platform, you're probably looking for more than just graphs. You want clarity, speed, and tools that actually help you lead better. Here are the features that matter most when replacing Allstacks:
You need more than a basic analytics tool. You need powerful insights, continuous improvement, and complete visibility across your entire software development lifecycle. With that in mind, let's talk about the 9 best Allstacks alternatives that offer stronger features for modern engineering teams.
If Allstacks isn’t giving you the clarity or control you need, you’ve got better options. Here are 6 good alternatives for 2025 to help you lead smarter, cut developer friction, and turn your data into valuable insights that actually guide decisions.
Chrono Platform gives you real-time visibility across your engineering projects, finances, and resources. You don’t just track time here. You also get retroactive time categorization, which means if your R&D priorities shift, your time data can shift with them. That’s ideal for teams claiming SR&ED or managing cost-based KPIs.
With Chrono, you get a 360-degree view of your software development process. You’ll know where your engineering hours go, how much of it is tied to strategic goals, and how that time turns into business outcomes. The platform connects to Jira, Google Calendar, Outlook, and more without replacing them. You can still plan in Jira, but you actually understand the output with Chrono.
If you’re growing fast and need on-demand hiring help or cost justification for your CFO, Chrono also includes capacity planning and hiring support. Plus, its infrastructure is SOC2- and ISO-ready, with DevOps support options for AWS, Azure, and GCP.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: Scaling teams needing business-aligned engineering decisions.
Website: https://www.chronoplatform.com/
Price plans:
Service subscriptions (add-ons):
If you're trying to align engineering with broader business goals, Jellyfish might catch your attention. You’ll get visibility into resource allocation and strategic alignment, which is helpful if you’re managing cross-functional priorities.
Alt text: Engineering investments and allocations in the Jellyfish platform
Jellyfish gives you solid dashboards to measure software delivery performance, but don’t expect much real-time data. It’s built more for high-level planning than fast decision-making.
The platform shines in large environments where you need to track budget usage, team focus, and initiative progress. It also has dedicated onboarding teams to help. But if you're hoping for deep documentation, it may leave you figuring things out on your own.
Compared to Allstacks, Jellyfish leans more into strategic alignment and budget tracking, while Allstacks focuses heavily on value stream metrics and machine learning forecasts for delivery risk and performance. Both tools help at the engineering leadership level, but Jellyfish lacks self-serve flexibility. Teams usually rely on its dedicated onboarding or vendor support to configure dashboards and processes.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: Mid-to-large organizations focused on cross-team alignment.
Website: https://jellyfish.co
Price plan: Custom pricing (contact sales)
DX takes a people-first approach to engineering analytics. Instead of just tracking metrics such as deployment frequency or lines of code, you get a full picture of how your developers feel and function. It blends platform data with developer self-reporting to measure team health, satisfaction, and productivity.
However, it also allows you to compare your results with industry benchmarks.
If you care about building a stronger culture, not just faster output, DX gives you the frameworks to do it. The proprietary DXI and Core 4 models let you dig into areas such as autonomy, clarity, and flow.
On the other hand, it lacks financial performance monitoring, proactive risk identification, and engineering operational efficiency.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: Engineering organizations focused on a productivity culture.
Website: https://getdx.com
Price plan: Custom pricing (contact sales)
LinearB helps you stay on top of your Git pipeline by tracking delivery metrics and automating workflows. You can measure metrics like deployment frequency, lead time, and PR cycle times while getting real-time suggestions to speed things up. This tool works best if your team lives in Git and relies on automation to reduce manual work.
But it’s not without issues. LinearB simplifies incident management too much by tying it almost entirely to tools such as Jira, which doesn’t give you the full picture. It also clones your entire repository to analyze data, which can raise serious security concerns depending on your setup.
If your team is DevOps-heavy and you’re looking to remove bottlenecks and move faster through Git-based automation, this could be a useful fit. However, it lacks engineering ROI intelligence and other features where Chrono Platform shines.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: DevOps-heavy teams wanting automation insights.
Website: https://linearb.io
Price plans:
Code Climate Velocity gives you a basic but clear view of engineering output by tracking pull requests, commits, and ticket progress. It’s typically used for performance tracking and helps you understand where your team spends time, how fast they ship, and who might need support.
Code Climate’s unique selling point is its GitHub Copilot. This tool automatically translates raw Git and project management data into actionable engineering health metrics. The goal is to surface risks like slow reviews or excessive WIP early, so leaders can coach teams and fine-tune workflows before problems hit delivery.
Code Climate includes customizable dashboards for visualizing activity, though you may find the reporting options a bit limited if you're trying to track custom workflows or compare sprint cycles.
The platform’s focus on software delivery processes makes it helpful for productivity coaching, but not for deeper financial or operational analytics. Some users have also raised concerns about its approach to repo access for metric calculation.
Compared to Chrono, Code Climate Velocity lacks some important features for engineering leaders, such as automated SR&ED, intelligent talent matching, or managed Cloud services.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: Teams seeking basic engineering output tracking.
Website: https://codeclimate.com
Price plans:
Swarmia positions itself as a developer-centric effectiveness platform, surfacing real-time DORA and SPACE metrics, CI and PR cycle-time insights, batch size tracking, and even developer experience surveys for a rounded view of delivery health.
Just like Allstacks, it has a self-serve setup for dashboarding and tooling, which is great for teams wanting control over metrics.
Allstacks is more focused on value-stream forecasts and machine-learning risk models. By comparison, Swarmia excels at speeding up team-level flow and surfacing blockers through live Slack signals and working agreements. Also, it offers more granular, real-time data, with no 24-hour delay.
However, Swarmia isn’t perfect. It doesn’t offer big-picture finance or R&D cost visibility, and it lacks features like automated SR&ED readiness or talent-matching tools that engineering execs might need at scale.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: Engineering teams focused on optimizing flow, developer experience, and daily delivery speed
Website: https://www.swarmia.com/
Price plans:
After reviewing these six Allstacks alternatives, one thing is clear: you need something that actually works for you. So, make sure the platform you settle on has real data you can use, with the integration depth and strategic reporting your team needs to grow. If you're scaling fast, Chrono helps you prove value and stay aligned across delivery and finance.
Skip the noise and go for a platform built for engineering leaders like you.
Chrono gives you real-time visibility into your engineering work and its impact on your bottom line.
If your CFO cares about ROI, we help you track it. You won’t be stuck explaining vanity metrics, because Chrono shows what matters.
Ready to move faster and make smarter decisions? Sign up for Chrono Platform and let’s get to work.
You’ve got strong choices, but if you’re looking for clarity, alignment, and ROI tracking in one place, Chrono Platform stands out. Other options, such as Jellyfish, DX, and LinearB, offer different slices of software engineering intelligence, but none bring delivery and finance together the way Chrono does.
Yes, Chrono Platform offers a free plan for up to 3 users. That gives you access to real data, not just high-level summaries. You can start small, test what matters, and scale when you're ready.
Chrono is a smart pick here, too. You get real-time engineering visibility and cost tracking without the clutter. Plus, it's easy to use and grows with you as your team scales.
If you’re leading a larger team, Chrono gives you strategic insight into both engineering output and financial performance. From custom metrics to resource planning, it's built to support growth and executive decisions.
Chrono Platform, DX, Jellyfish, and LinearB all offer full cloud-based access. They’re reliable, scalable, and integrate with your project management tool stack.
Yes, Chrono Platform offers a responsive, mobile-friendly experience. You can track what matters, even on the go.
Allstacks leans into value stream forecasting. Chrono goes deeper into actual time usage, business alignment, and 360-degree visibility with fewer vanity metrics and clearer business signals.
If you care about outcomes tied to strategy, then yes. Chrono gives you additional insights across delivery, cost, and hiring, without drowning you in data that doesn’t move the needle.